Tiger servur Vs Windows 2003 server

Thanks yakusa fot he tip.

An article published by eWeek.com raises concerns among the dark side of computing.
In his paper, San Gallager spills the beans: "Tiger server includes a new Access Control List (ACL) scheme that allows seamless access by Windows clients".
Yikes! It means that OSX 10.4 uses a scheme similar to that used by XP and Win 2k3 Server, allowing Win computers to access shares and applications exactly in the same way as on a Windows Server...
[moose: "they're trying to trick us, my precious, yessssss!"]
And if you consider that Apple doesn't charge on a per-client basis, a server running Tiger instead of Windows 2003 could save you big bucks"

On a similar topic, but on a grimer side, Jean-Philippe warns us that Cisco's VPN is not yet compatible with Tiger. The company has announced they would release an update before the end of the month.