Since this morning, the MacBidouille RC5 team has climbed up one step to the 7th place worldwide.
A big thank you to the people who participate in this adventure.
If you'vee already read the first episodes of the adventures of Roberto and Pépita, Vincent Lacroix just finished the 8th Episode (in English too).
http://macfr.com/communaute/Roberto/
Quite a few companies now run with a 802.11b wireless network. Some of them really rely on the availability and the uptime of their network. A researcher from the Queensland University of Technology, found a flaw in the broadly used 802.11b protocol. (802.11g is not affected).
It is possible to completely disrupt the traffic of such network with fairly common equipment, even from 1km away. It seems all that is required is to send a certain type of data.
No need to do all that to bring an Airport wireless network to its knees, though. During the 2003 Apple Expo, some of our team members played with a 30db pringle antenna.
You just needed to point it to one direction, and all the wireless networks in its path were knocked out :)
BTI (Battery Technology) just released an external battery system for iPod 3G and iPod mini.
It does not charge the internal battery, but extends its autonomy to 40 hours.
We think however that it still has a few disadvantages...

1) It's a fridge! it's a ship ! it's ... huge !
2) It is rated for only 400 charge cycles.
3) It does not work with 1G iPod, which would definitely enjoy the extra hours.
Those who hit the road often, with solid and deep pockets (or kevlar belts...) will probably find it useful.
http://www.batterytech.com/ipod_info
PS: What about one that is a fourth of this size and runs for 10hours ?
Even with Intel having invested almost US$600million in DDR2 RAM manufacturers, this product doesn't seem ready from prime time. There might be an intermediary step, with DDR 500.
A few facts are folding the same way :
-DDR2 will cost more than the already expensive DDR
-Contrary to the expectations, DDR2 is not much less power hungry than DDR, the performance increase should be around 3%.
-The CAS of DDR2 is a bit high, meaning that only the future DDR2 667MHz should bring noticable performance gains. However the entry level DDR should be running at 400 and 533MHz.
-The slots are not pin to pin compatible with DDR ones (240 pins vs 184 for DDR), which implies a total redesign.
All of the above lead the chip manufacturers not to be in much of a hurry, when Intel will soon desperately need that type of memory.
Of course, nothing has emerged from the Apple side. But seeing how the G5 likes very broad bandwidths, one can think that they will switch to DDR2 as soon as possible.